Not sure what to make of this. Talking of Defkalion, Andrea Rossi says that he led the company a false trail. They took the bait, thinking that he would be selling small eCats in October. In doing so, it wrong-footed them and upset their plans to present a fake version of the same. As we all know, according to AR, he has the goods and they do not. What puzzles me (among lots) is that in public, the inventor has been reasonably consistent about disagreeing with Defkalion’s small-unit strategy. The only way I can parse this apparent inconsistency is by assuming that the following statement is not true or that, while he disagreed with DGT’s way of doing things, the contract allowed them to take whatever route they desired within their territory. In other words, he publicly disagreed but planned to service their roll-out plan.
Am I missing something? One thing is certain – this is an absolute admission by AR that he engages in misdirection. So, is this recent statement a lie or is it true and he lied to Defkalion? I do not have a problem with these sort of tactics. I put great store in personal honesty but understand the need to be wily in business and politics when swimming with sharks. This confirmation of misdirection should be front and centre when we’re trying to figure out what’s going on.
We have less than a week before Defkalion put themselves on the spot. It will be interesting to see if they deliver hot air or scalding oil.
When will the experiment in Bologna and Uppsala university start?
- Andrea Rossi
Soon, but remember that such R&D will be closed doors made and not public. I repeat: no more public tests will be made. We will make only closed doors R&D and tests for our Customers made along the test protocols agreed upon the purchasing contracts. No more information will be released until proper patent protection will be granted. Too many vultures fly around, ready to steal critic info. Look to what is going on around the Balcans: there are clowns saying they have a technology copied from us, actually they have just a moke up, waiting for the piece of info they need to make a real copy. They believed we would have been selling in October the small E-Cats, so announced they would have made a demo in october ( buying a model, disguising it as a copy made by them). But it was just a trap we made. Conclusion: from now on we will be more sealed than ever, and we will be open exclusively with our Customers.
To put for sale the small unts we need:
1- safety certification
2- granted patents
We are working on both the issues and I think they will be addressed within 1 to 2 years from now.
[With thanks to Arian]<< Previous Post -- -- Next post >>